Why Milestone-Based Delivery Beats Hourly Billing
Hourly billing creates misaligned incentives. Here's why milestones work better for everyone.
Insights on software development, technical strategy, and building reliable systems.
Hourly billing creates misaligned incentives. Here's why milestones work better for everyone.
The statistic is sobering: 70% of software projects fail to deliver on time, on budget, or on scope. Here's what causes these failures and how to prevent them.
Technical debt is inevitable, but it doesn't have to be unmanageable. Learn strategies for keeping it under control.
When your service depends on five other services, how do you test it without standing up the entire system? Stubs, mocks, and service virtualization are the answer.
Most agencies take a month to get started after signing. We start delivering value in 48 hours. Here's exactly how.
E2E tests have a reputation for being slow, brittle, and expensive to maintain. They don't have to be. Here's how to build an E2E suite that stays reliable as your codebase grows.
Your project is off the rails. Deadlines blown. Budget gone. Trust broken. Here's how to salvage it—or know when to walk away.
Code coverage tells you which lines ran during tests. Mutation testing tells you whether your tests would actually catch a bug. The difference is significant.
Your lead developer just quit. Nobody knows how the system works. This was preventable.
Contract testing makes your API agreements machine-verifiable, so breaking changes are caught before they reach production and crash your consumers.
Your freelancer stopped responding. Your agency went dark. Your code is sitting on someone else's server. Now what?
The testing pyramid tells you to write more unit tests than integration tests and more integration tests than E2E tests. But what does that actually look like in a real codebase?
Every software estimate is wrong. The question is whether you plan for that reality or pretend it doesn't exist.
Most businesses treat software like a one-time purchase. It's not. It's a living system that either appreciates or decays.
A $50/hour developer who takes 200 hours costs more than a $150/hour developer who takes 50. Here's how to compare what actually matters.
Let's discuss how we can help you build reliable software.
We use cookies to analyze site usage and improve your experience. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn more about our privacy policy